Informizely customer feedback surveys
By using the Aculab site, you agree with our use of cookies.

Contact centre technologies – Issue six

Hello, from Aculab call central.

In this post, the sixth of several more, I’ll continue delving into the scourge of abandoned calls in more detail, looking at reasons for call abandonment. If you’ve got a question, you’re welcome to post it below, in the comments section.

Effectiveness factors

In the previous post, I took a look at the first of three important factors, which impact on the effectiveness or success of outbound dialling campaigns. Those factors are: i) accuracy in detecting tones; ii) live speaker detection accuracy; and iii) call connection time.

In this post, I’ll look at the second of those factors, namely live speaker detection accuracy, or differentiating between human and non-human responses.

Are we human?

Once a call is answered (other than for fax or modem calls), the dialler needs to determine whether the entity on the other end of the line is a live speaker i.e., a human being or an answering machine or voicemail system (the so-called auto-voice condition).

Live speaker detection (LSD) is often used to screen out voicemail recordings or answering machines. That is very important, considering answering machine use is prevalent in many countries, particularly the United States and Canada.

Typically, campaign calls reach an answering machine as much as 80% of the time, especially during normal, Monday-Friday business hours, when a lot of folks are not at home. That means less than 20% of outbound call attempts actually reach a real person.

Or are we dancer?

Many prominent vendors argue that the main issue arises when the LSD software mistakenly determines that a call is answered by a human, when it should have detected a voicemail greeting. They point to loss of productivity in the time wasted by the agent before being able to release that call.

That lost productivity is an issue, but it’s not the key issue.

The key issue

If the LSD software mistakenly identifies that a call is answered by a machine, when in reality it was answered by a human, the call will be terminated and classed as an abandoned call. Those are the cases that matter. So don’t go barking up the wrong tree.

Those calls are known as ‘false positives’ and have a twofold affect. Yes, productivity can be impacted, but the loss of a sales opportunity through failure to connect with the called party can impact a collection agency’s bottom line far more than the short time needed for the agent to wrap up a call in the converse scenario ever could.

Secondly, for the individual on the receiving end of an abandoned call, it can be a major cause of annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety. That’s the key issue and why abandoned call rates, as a percentage of live calls, are subject to regulatory limits.

Chose well and sleep soundly

So the ability to recognise a live speaker and avoid abandoned calls is a desirable capability from your call progress analysis (CPA) and LSD software.

Stop by next week for more, when I’ll be looking into the third of those three very important factors that have a bearing on abandoned calls, namely call connection time. Auf Wiedersehen!

Joeb Logger Avatar
  - Joeb Logger

Archive

The Aculab blog

News, views and industry insights from Aculab

  • The seven realms of Broadcast Messaging

    Broadcast messaging that uses a cloud-based service is a natural choice. Using a cloud as-a-service approach gives a variety of message delivery options, and cuts down costs by automatically scaling to meet demand. Find out what makes Aculab Cloud such a natural choice for voice and SMS broadcast messaging, and how other customers are already reaping the benefits from using Aculab's CPaaS platform.

    Read more

  • The technology working behind the scenes to support emergency services networks

    Now more than ever, telecoms infrastructures play a vital role in supporting the health of our communities. Behind the scenes, networking technologies are working to keep the lines of communications open between emergency services and those in need.

    A recent example from the Lombardy region of Italy highlights a typical scenario:

    Read more

  • What’s wrong with Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA)?

    For many years, online and telephone-based authentication has relied on knowledge-based systems using passwords, PINs, and question-and-answer dialogues to confirm a customer’s identity. With the explosion in the number of contact centres, this approach is close to breaking point. Nobody in the modern world can be expected to remember all of the passwords they need to securely access all their services.

    Read more

  • It’s voice biometrics, not rocket science

    The concept of biometric speaker identification or verification may, at one stage, have seemed like a technical nightmare. The reality is somewhat different. All the sophisticated algorithms and voice processing have already been developed; deploying the application is actually the simple part.

    Read more

  • Multi-lingual speech recognition now supported on Aculab Cloud

    We’re listening – what would you like to do today?

    A generation of people have grown up trying to avoid ringing a contact centre – not because they didn’t like talking to the cheery people who work in such places, but because they first had to get past the IVR system put in place to direct the call. Press 1 for support, 2 for sales, 3 if you know the extension of the person you wish to speak to.…and so on, and so on. We quickly realised that many of these systems would let you bypass the IVR menu and get to a real person if we pressed ‘0’.

    Read more